(no subject)

[allisnow]

Continuing to indulge my Marvel addiction with a rewatch of Iron Man 2. Definitely not the best film in the franchise (IMO it goes Avengers, Iron Man, Captain America, Thor, Iron Man 2, then The Hulk which I've actually never seen but feel qualified to pass judgement on anyway) but I don't really care because Natasha love! ♥♥♥♥♥♥

Comments

[last-archangel.livejournal.com]

In retrospect, The Incredible Hulk was pretty not-good, but about 85% of the blame goes to General Ross/William Hurt for being the LAMEST VILLAIN EVER. Norton was pretty good (nothing on Ruffalo, but what can you do?), Liv Tyler was decent, and Tim Roth was AWESOME as Abomination. Saving grace was Stark's cameo.

[allisnow.livejournal.com]

Funny, I didn't even know who was in it besides Norton. I think I got turned off by the quick-turnaround reboot. Might have to watch it just to see how lame this villain is :)

[last-archangel.livejournal.com]

The Ang Lee "HULK" was so awful that it called for an almost-immediate reboot. And "HULK" doesn't fit into the "Avengers" series, so that needed to be addressed as well.

Like I said, it isn't terrible. But be warned, it is still the weakest of the "Avengers" series. But even with her whispery acting, Liv Tyler's Betty Ross is 8 billion times more interesting than Natalie Portman's Jane Foster.

[allisnow.livejournal.com]

A box of hair is more interesting than Portman's Jane ;)