![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So, on a day when we had protesters being killed in the streets of Tehran, Obama's handlers think it's a good time for him to go out and enjoy an ice cream photo-op with the kiddies?
Maybe I need someone to explain this one to me.
Maybe I need someone to explain this one to me.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-21 06:19 pm (UTC)What irritates me is that the press spends so much more time covering that, than say... oh, Iran!
no subject
Date: 2009-06-21 06:50 pm (UTC)But yes, MSNBC is just beyond pathetic.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-21 07:11 pm (UTC)Remember Bush golfing around the time of Katrina and all the crap he got for it?
The difference here is that Katrina was a domestic issue; you're going to get more media/regular people caring about it and what the president does than an international issue like Iran.
Obama issued a statement about Iran earlier that day. He's in a tricky situation because doing much more than saying, "We're watching and we don't like what we see," is going to give the pro-government Iranians another excuse to blame America and other Western countries for being behind the protests...like the state media was doing on Saturday before Obama issued a statement.
no subject
Date: 2009-06-21 09:17 pm (UTC)The difference here is that Katrina was a domestic issue; you're going to get more media/regular people caring about it and what the president does than an international issue like Iran.
Not sure I agree with that. Dealing with the aftermath of a hurricane is not specifically the President's job. Dealing with other countries that pose a potential threat to the US is.
But it doesn't matter because in the lapdog media (http://patterico.com/2009/06/20/contrast-iranian-protestors-shot-as-obama-goes-for-ice-cream/)'s eyes, Obama can do no wrong. I guess that's why Axelrod and the rest of Obama's people didn't think about what kind of message they might be sending.